Demand Calendar Blog by Anders Johansson

Your Hotel Doesn't Have a Service Problem—It Has a Customer Problem.

Written by Anders Johansson | 10 February 2026
In our rush to satisfy every whim, we have overlooked a fundamental business truth. Peter Drucker, the father of modern management, famously argued that “the purpose of business is to create a customer.” This distinction is subtle but transformative. To "create" a customer implies a deliberate act of selection and brand alignment. It suggests that a business must first define exactly who it is for—and, by extension, who it is not for.
 
When we analyze friction in modern hotels through Drucker's lens, a new reality emerges: most "unhappy" guests are not the victims of a missed service promise. Rather, the hotel has simply attracted the wrong customer. When a guest demands an experience that contradicts the hotel’s operational DNA, they aren't "right"—they are just in the wrong building.
 The Drucker Filter: Segment Failure vs. Service Failure

To apply Drucker’s logic to a modern hotel, we have to distinguish between two very different types of guest dissatisfaction. When a hotel fails to deliver on its explicit promise—a dirty room, a lost reservation, or a cold meal—that is a Service Failure. In these cases, the customer is, indeed, right.

However, the vast majority of "unhappy" guest interactions today fall under the Segment Failure category. This happens when a guest expects an experience that the hotel never intended to provide.

  • The Mismatch: A guest books a boutique, high-energy social hotel known for its rooftop DJ and then complains about the "noise" at 10 PM.
  • The Entitlement: A traveler chooses a tech-forward, self-service concept like citizenM and then demands a traditional bellhop to carry their luggage.

In both scenarios, the hotel did not fail; the guest was simply never the "customer" the business was designed to "create." When we treat these guests as being "right," we force the operation to bend into a shape it cannot sustain. We end up overextending our staff and resources to appease someone who will never be satisfied because the brand’s core identity is fundamentally at odds with their personal preferences.

The Self-Inflicted Wound: "Heads in Beds"

The industry’s struggle with the "wrong" customer isn't just a byproduct of bad luck; it is a self-inflicted wound. In the hunt for high occupancy, many hotels have fallen into the trap of focusing exclusively on "heads in beds." By using aggressive discounting, broad-net OTAs, and opaque pricing, hotels often attract guests based on price alone rather than brand alignment. When you compete on price, you attract a guest whose only loyalty is to the lowest bid—not to your concept, your culture, or your service model. The result is a fundamental mismatch: the hotel gets the occupancy it wanted, but at the cost of its operational sanity.

The High Cost of the Wrong Customer: Five Pillars of Operational Decay

When a hotel prioritizes the "wrong" customer—those lured in by desperate "heads in beds" tactics—over its own operational standards, it triggers a compounding negative impact. This isn't just a minor inconvenience; it is a slow-motion collapse of the business model.

By following the "Customer is Always Right" fallacy into the trap of unlimited appeasement, hoteliers face five distinct types of erosion:

  1. Financial Erosion (The Profit Drain): Resources are diverted toward "bribing" guests to stay quiet. This includes comping rooms, offering food-and-beverage credits, and providing labor-intensive "miracle fixes" that were never budgeted. These are not investments in loyalty; they are ransoms paid to guests who will never return at full price.
  2. Cultural Erosion (The Talent Exodus): Your best employees—Drucker’s "knowledge workers"—become demoralized. When management forces staff to apologize for things that aren't mistakes, it destroys their professional dignity. This leads to a toxic cycle of burnout and high turnover, as top-tier talent leaves for environments where their expertise is respected over a guest’s tantrum.
  3. Brand Erosion (The Identity Crisis): By trying to be everything to everyone, the hotel loses the very essence that attracts its actual target audience. You trade your brand's soul for a temporary occupancy spike. Eventually, your true "created" customers stop coming because the atmosphere has been diluted by guests who don't belong there.
  4. Operational Erosion (The Standard Decay): When "the customer is always right," Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) become suggestions rather than rules. Management begins making "exceptions" so frequently that the staff no longer knows the actual standard. This inconsistency creates a chaotic environment where quality control becomes impossible to maintain.
  5. Reputational Erosion (The Review Paradox): Ironically, the more you appease the wrong customer, the more your reputation suffers. These guests are the most likely to leave "review-bombs" even after being compensated. Meanwhile, your ideal guests—who value the hotel's original concept—begin leaving negative reviews because the presence of the "wrong" crowd has ruined their experience.

The Backlash: Rewriting the Rules of Service

Forward-thinking hoteliers are beginning to realize that "full" is not the same as "successful." They are shifting from a posture of surrender to one of confident professionalism. To fix the "Selfridge problem" and move toward a Drucker-inspired model, the industry is adopting five new pillars of operational integrity:

  1. Strategic Alignment in Marketing and Distribution. The work starts long before the guest arrives. Every touchpoint—from the imagery on the website to the tone of social media and the selection of distribution channels—must be engineered to attract the "right" guest. If your hotel is a high-energy social hub, don’t use peaceful, spa-like imagery to chase a different demographic. Marketing should be a filter, not just a net.
  2. Radical Transparency in Pre-Arrival Communication. Set the right expectations early. Use pre-arrival emails and messaging to reinforce the hotel’s concept. If you don't have bellhops, or if your rooftop bar is loud until midnight, tell them. By being transparent about what you are and what you are not, you give the "wrong" guest a chance to self-select out or adjust their expectations.
  3. Concept-Centric Staff Training. Ensure that the team understands the hotel's "Why." When staff members deeply understand the concept and why it appeals to your specific target audience, they are better equipped to serve that audience. Training should move away from generic scripts and toward understanding the specific needs and requirements of your actual customers.
  4. Price Integrity Over Desperation Campaigns. Avoid the "occupancy at any cost" trap. Tempering with pricing through aggressive discounting or flash-sale campaigns is the fastest way to attract the wrong guest. Maintain price integrity to ensure your guests are value-aligned, not just price-aligned.
  5. Technology as a Feedback Loop. Use technology to protect the brand. This means tracking incidents to identify serial "review terrorists," using AI to analyze review sentiment, and—most importantly—gathering direct feedback from team members. Your staff is the first to know when the guest profile is shifting; their insights are the ultimate early-warning system for segment failure.

Conclusion: A Legacy Reconsidered

Harry Gordon Selfridge gave us a powerful tool for building trust, but his failure to set limits became his downfall. Peter Drucker gave us the strategy to survive: define your customer, create them, and protect the promise you made to them.

The future of hospitality doesn't belong to the hotels that try to satisfy everyone. It belongs to the hotels that have the courage to be exactly who they are—and the wisdom to let the "wrong" customer find a bed somewhere else.